Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
Answer:
ye
Explanation:
we know that lol. btw do u have a licence.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
human smuggling:
the transportation or assistance of humans across international borders in exchange for money
Under small bridge or anything that will pretty much hit the top of the car
Answer:
If the official treaty of the declaration of intemperance isn't multiplied by the diameter of the radius x would be 46 and be subtracted by i.
Explanation:
Lemme break It down to you on foe nem
If the quadrilateral starts in the circumference of the radius the convention source of law wouldn't be able to be multiplied by 6 x 2q unless it is stuck under a bush where I hide my squirrels at.
Other than that you would only get the 42 minus x equals 89 if the declaration independence qualifies as 22986.
Hope this helped
