Answer: this example illustrates subjective measure of fairness
Explanation:
In this case, each person has a different point of view of what is fair or equitable in a relationship.
The correct answer is the nature vs. nurture debate.
The nature vs. nurture debate refers to psychological concept, wherein the cause and underlying factors of personality and development are discussed. While some argue that <em>nature</em> (internal biological make up and genetics) determine one's personality, others argue that <em>nurture</em>, or external factors such as socialization, family environment, learning at school etc., determine one's personality.
Answer: a. The judiciary branch trying to hold a congressperson accountable if they overstep their role by meeting foreign leaders in an official diplomatic capacity to reverse US foreign policy.
Explanation: One important principle embodied in the U.S. Constitution is separation of powers.
If there are checks and balances, the branches of government can limit the powers of the others and no one branch will become too powerful over other branches. Checks and balances makes sure that the power is balanced between the branches of government.
The Executive Branch of government checks on Legislative by having the capability to veto bills. By rejection of appointments, the legislative Branch of government can put checks on the executive Branch. The legislative branch checks on Judicial by having the capacity to impeach the Supreme Court Justices.
Judicial Branch of government is the most powerful of all the branches. The Judicial Branch has the power to declare the acts of the congress and the executive branch of government un-constitutional.
Overstepping boundaries is unconstitutional in the US branches of government.
For the answer to the question above, In the context of psychology's scientific method, a theory is defined as the relatively enduring characteristic of an individual.
I hope my answer helped you. feel free to ask more question. Have a nice day!
