Answer:
(C) Joss should charge Iris $500 and Daphne $800, that way economic surplus is maximized.
Explanation:
Assuming information asymmetries in the market, and Iris and Daphne are incapable of compare their willingness to pay against the average price of the market for this type of service, C is true since Joss maximize the economic surplus by increasing his productivity using the time better than his opportunity cost.
Answer:Share premium account of $24,000
The provider of attorney services of $30,000
Explanation:
On provision of services, the Attorney services expenses account is debited with $54,000 and the attorney services provider account credited with $54,000
Furthermore a share account is opened for the provider and credited with $30,000 , the share premium is credited $24,000 and a debit transfer is made to his liability account initially credited.
The $24,000 credit to share premium represents the difference between the nominal value of the share of $5 and the market value of $9 multiply by the 30,000 shares he was paid with.
Also a memorandum will be issued to state that 6000 share has been transferred from Miller to the attorney services provider and the shares will be delited from his name and entered in the name of the services provider because the credit of shares to his account does not represents new shares issued but it's the transfer of Miller's shares to him.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The hedonic property value method determines the extent that environmental or ecosystem factors affect the price of a home. This implies that the method cannot be used to estimate lost, non-use value associated with oil pollution at remote, uninhabited locations, as stated in the question. Since the hedonic property value method is used to estimate the housing prices that reflect the value of local environmental attributes, it is not useful for uninhabited, remote locations and properties.
