Answer:
C. It lists possible solutions to Cuban and American political issues and their economies.
Explanation:
Ted Piconet works for Foreign Policy program’s acting vice president and direction, specializing in relations between United States and countries in Latin America.
In one of his speech in United Nations' events, he address the political issues that exist between American and Cuban people due to their differing political ideologies and economic system.
At the end of his speech, he listed how people In United States can help people in Cuba with their economic problem (using their tourism service is one of the thing that Americans can do to help). Putting this call to action at the end of speech is intended to let the audience know with the roles that they can do to create solutions for the problem.
Answer:
On my day to day activities I usually dwell on gaming technology .This what describes me and forms a framework of my values , hobbies and interests .Apart from relying on technology I usually take my time to understand human interests so that if I am working on a product I do it to serve human beings .
Explanation:
I think this is an open ended question ,
Back to the question , I base my argument on my daily activities .Normally My work , hobbies and recreation purely imply what I love doing .From my angle of view this are my interests , values , passion and strengths .
I usually work on gaming technology on my professional work , after a long day of work normally resolve to skating to free up my mind if I am not reading or video gaming especially on virtual reality .
So my hobbies and interests in a way interrelate with my professional self .
I hop[e the question is an open ended question and the views are purely personal; and describe my lifestyle .
Answer:
Explanation:
False False So darn false economics 101 is based in an theoretical economy...
When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4
