Answer:
Rosa's whole childhood was influenced by segregation of everything; restrooms, drinking fountains, education and transportation. She was also sick most of the time.
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
Answer:
I think I know two
1) "Go make yourself some friends or you'll be lonely"
2) "Go get yourself a wife or you'll be lonely"
Explanation:
I really hope this helps!!
Have a great night!!!
...That is one of my favorite songs, lol.
After reading the scenario, we can say the following about Camilla's probable actions at level 2 of moral development:
At level 2 of her moral development, Camilla would most likely report the theft.
Perhaps, in order to help the hungry person, she would give him/her food herself. But still, since at level 2 she has internalized society's moral standards and rules, she would report the theft because that is the right thing to do according to society.
- This question refers to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development, which is comprised of 3 levels. At the second level, which is the level Camilla is at, we accept the notion of right and wrong given to us by others in society.
The three levels are:
1.<u> Preconventional level</u>: when children still have no sense of morality and their decisions are guided by adults.
2. Conventional level: when children accept the moral code and the sense of right and wrong she has learned. Most adults remain at this level.
3.<u> Postconventional level:</u> when the person understands universal ethical principles but makes her own judgments based on her own individual sense of right and wrong.
- If Camilla is at the second level, she will most likely conform to society's rules and expectations.
- That does not mean she can't understand that there is a hungry person in need. She will likely help this person too, but that will not prevent her from reporting the crime.
- In conclusion, having the above information in mind, we can answer that Camilla might report the theft and help the hungry person.
Learn more about the subject here:
brainly.com/question/6470690?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/4309262?referrer=searchResults
The pardoner is the last pilgrim to be portrayed in the prologue. His estate belongs to the court of Rome. This gentle pardoner is thought to be worthy of respect; "He had a scholarly look" and "He was an honest person." Nevertheless, his pretension not to care for riches and his being "an unethical man" oppose the positive idea created. The inference that can be made from the excerpt is that he was an unethical man.
