Answer:
A fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards.
Explanation:
Answer:
Symbolism: weak presidency/adminsitration
Explanation:
symbolism originated in late 19th-century France and Belgium, with figures such as, Maeterlinck, Verlaine, Rimbaud. Symbolism is the representation of ideas through symbols such as images in the above example. Symbolism aims to communicate ideas, qualities or state of mind by employing indirect means such as representing these ideas through images, writing or any other means. This is seen with the cartoonist above who communicates the failure of the presidency through cartoon images
Answer:
(Options given are not right.)
Courage Leadership Competencies.
Explanation:
The skills and behaviors that leads a leader in contribution of higher performances are called leadership competencies.
The skills that are mentioned in the question comes under "Courageous" leadership competencies.
A good leader possesses the quality of courage. Means he can withstand the danger. He is prepared to take up new ventures. And is not fearful when faced with problems.
This quality of a leader helps his team to rely on him trustfully.
Answer:
It is an Evasion Plan of Action.
Explanation:
An Evasion Plan of Action also known as EPA is a plan widely used by the armed forces or any other institution that establishes direct combat missions.
This plan allows evasion strategies to be established promoting the institution to have a successful recovery, given its status within the conflict. All this through the collection of precious information about the conflict that allows the combat team to increase their strategies and establish a predictability of what may happen during the conflict.
Answer:
Explanation:
The French and Indian War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years’ War. The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war’s expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
Map from the French and Indian War
The French and Indian War resulted from ongoing frontier tensions in North America as both French and British imperial officials and colonists sought to extend each country’s sphere of influence in frontier regions. In North America, the war pitted France, French colonists, and their Native allies against Great Britain, the Anglo-American colonists, and the Iroquois Confederacy, which controlled most of upstate New York and parts of northern Pennsylvania. In 1753, prior to the outbreak of hostilities, Great Britain controlled the 13 colonies up to the Appalachian Mountains, but beyond lay New France, a very large, sparsely settled colony that stretched from Louisiana through the Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes to Canada. (See Incidents Leading up to the French and Indian War and Albany Plan)
The border between French and British possessions was not well defined, and one disputed territory was the upper Ohio River valley. The French had constructed a number of forts in this region in an attempt to strengthen their claim on the territory. British colonial forces, led by Lieutenant Colonel George Washington, attempted to expel the French in 1754, but were outnumbered and defeated by the French. When news of Washington’s failure reached British Prime Minister Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, he called for a quick undeclared retaliatory strike. However, his adversaries in the Cabinet outmaneuvered him by making the plans public, thus alerting the French Government and escalating a distant frontier skirmish into a full-scale war.
