Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
Answer:
The pandemic has caused the largest and fastest decline in international flows — including trade, foreign direct investment, and international travel — in modern history. While these numbers imply a major rollback of globalization’s recent gains, they don’t necessarily signal a fundamental collapse of international market integration. But how deep will the plunge really be? How fast can we expect global flows to rebound? And how might future flow patterns look different from the past? Leaders can find clues about the future and actionable implications for their companies by focusing on five key drivers of globalization’s trajectory: 1) global growth patterns; 2) supply-chain policies; 3) superpower frictions and fragility; 4) ongoing technical shifts; and 5) my opinion
Explanation:
<h2>
George Washington said in his farewell that "Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course" that America should control its own destiny resonates today in the debate over missile defense.</h2>
Explanation:
Washington mentioned in his farewell that the nation should avoid creating alliances with European nations. He also argued that today America should have control on its own future for the control of missile defense.
Threats and demands of distant dictator, terrorists and madmen can only be protected by a proper missile defense system.
From the world and its corruption by vast oceans Americans felt protected for the last few years. Despite of all the passionate disagreement over the missile shield, building is more suggestive..
The father was the person in a Greek family who held the most power. Like any family, it is always the father who gets the most power with the most say. He is kind of like the leader or "king" of the family, since he has the most power.
Hope I helped!
- Debbie
<span />
The correct answer is A. The South lacked capital and educated labour force. The Southern economy did not develop like the North because the South was strongly Angelican while the north was Puritain which led to differences in work ethic and education. Puritainism values a literate population because everyone should be able to read the Bible, while in the south, books did not matter and education was considered to be for the wealthy. Economy in the South was based around human labor and slavery. The North used more ingenuity and intellect which led to blossoming of the industry and trade.
