His power of how the government would be best is the form of what it is today. The president that we have runs the country not alone like a king, but with others. The government we have approves or denies policies the president want to be in effect with a majority vote. These are just a few of these impacts that Locke gave us from the past to today.
That was probably terrible; I'm bad at rephrasing stuff but hope that helped
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Andrew Jackson was considered "people´s president" in that he supported poor Americans and farmers. Indeed, he invited these people to his inauguration in Washington D.C., increasing his popularity among these Americans. So, although he had many problems with the United States Congress and called him a King for his authoritative ways, President Jackson can be best referred to as a “common man” because the decisions he made in favor of common American citizen, such as terminating the Second Bank of the United States.
I think it is B) the founder of Tuskegee Institute.
Answer:
The dry climate of the region.
Explanation:
Southwestern United States is a region of the United States. Culturally, the states clearly influenced by Mexico, such as Texas, New Mexico and Arizona, are considered to be part of this region. Southern Nevada and parts of Colorado and California are often included in it.
This region is an arid and hot zone, in which several deserts coexist, such as the Mojave Desert and the Sonoran Desert. It is the driest area in the nation, which historically limited the demographic development of the region, with which today, as a consequence, the states of the Southwest have a low population density, concentrated mainly in large cities such as Phoenix, Houston, El Paso or Albuquerque.
Answer:
This statement is True. Physical evidence is seen as more objective.
Explanation:
Witness opinions are considered subjective accounts and they can be subject to bias and inaccuracies so they are seen as less concrete and reliable as evidence. It builds a stronger case against a defendant if the prosecution can provide physical evidence that a crime or wrongdoing occurred. Another related term is circumstantial evidence which would imply that someone might be guilty of a crime without the physical proof, like being caught holding a gun at a crime scene for instance. The circumstantial evidence would be being seen holding the gun; the physical evidence would be proof the bullets came from the gun.
