Answer:
C) by giving an example of how Mary Beth Tinker did, in fact, disrupt her mathematics class
.
Explanation:
Petitioner John F. Tinker, 15 years of age, and solicitor Christopher Eckhardt, 16 years of age, went to secondary schools in Des Moines, Iowa. Candidate Mary Beth Tinker, John's sister, was a 13-year-old understudy in middle school.
In December 1965, a gathering of grown-ups and understudies in Des Moines held a gathering at the Eckhardt home. The gathering resolved to pitch their complaints to the threats in Vietnam and their help for a détente by wearing dark armbands amid the Christmas season and by fasting on December 16 and New Year's Eve. Candidates and their folks had recently occupied with comparable exercises, and they chose to take part in the program.
The principals of the Des Moines schools wound up mindful of the arrangement to wear armbands. On December 14, 1965, they met and received a strategy that any understudy wearing an armband to class would be approached to expel it, and on the off chance that he declined he would be suspended until he returned without the armband. Candidates knew about the guideline that the school specialists embraced.
On December 16, Mary Beth and Christopher wore dark armbands to their schools. John Tinker wore his armband the following day. They were altogether sent home and suspended from school until they would return without their armbands. They didn't come back to class until after the arranged period for wearing armbands had lapsed - that is, until after New Year's Day.
B, becuase it is giving you advice on what to do to succeed in yorur report writing.
I hope that this helps! :)
It’s important to experience and enjoy everyday—Apex Learning
Answer:
Explanation:
"A Jury of Her Peers'' was written by Susan Glaspell. She employs a narrative tone to describe the story. The resolution forms part of the story and it's where the story ends. It is at this point that conflicts are resolved and the story comes to an end. The plot was considered as a feminist literature because two female characters were trying to come up with a solution to a mystery. Mrs Hale and Mrs Peters came up with the conclusion that Mrs Wright killed her husband, and her actions are justified. The circumstances behind the death of John Wright leaves the townsmen in a state of confusion as to what could have led to his death. Mrs Wright killed her husband because she was physically abused by her. Mrs Hale and Mrs Peters hide the evidence against her because they understand how it feels to be humiliated and oppressed by a man. In the end, Mrs Wright is granted freedom.
