Answer:
A real war and a "war" of fighting to grow old and successful
Explanation:
Based on the excerpt, Robert Louis Stevenson was reminiscing about his days as a younger man and the internal conflicts he had.
In the first paragraph, he talked about the real war he witnessed where he heard the "loudness" of the battles and the "pain of men's wounds". He also talked about another internal "war" which had to do with "slavery of competition", toiling for years and which culminated to fighting to be old and successful.
Answer:
After changing the sentence into the past perfect form, we have:
They had watched the movie (yesterday).
Explanation:
The past perfect tense is used to express actions that took place in the past before another action that also took place in the past. Take a look at the timeline below:
-----------------I -----------------I -----------------I-----------------I
past perf. s. past s. present future
The structure of the past perfect is: subject + had + verb (past participle). It is commonly used in sentences that also use the simple past, precisely because the past perfect expresses the action that took place first. For example:
- I had already called you twice when you finally showed up.
In the sentence we are changing here, I placed the adverb of time "yesterday" inside parentheses because it is usually employed with the simple past. However, depending on the context, it is possible for it to be used with the past perfect:
They had watched the movie (yesterday).
But it sounds better if we change "yesterday":
They had watched the movie the day before.
Both sentences would be correct.
Answer:
when you look at the book it seems as if there has something to do with fire. The word Fahrenheit might give an assumption to that or it could possibly be the way the matches look like a book and waiting for it to flame up. It could also mean that there is flames of passion that could be in the book. Of course it could also be about firemen on how they do there job. Someone could be a firemen and wrote their personal experience. You could say something big would happen because the way it was presented. Something bad could happen as in a fire in a neighborhood or something else. It could also be about betrayal and how a person burned everything they did. Another bad thing could be is that someone may have hurt another and the victim has that memory of what that person did, as if it burned into their mind. A burning memory, lingering to be into the light. It could also be about truth coming to light or in this case fire, for it has been hidden in darkness for too long.
(hope this is long enough sentences) (•‿•)
Does Mrs. Whitaker's behavior at the end of the story suggest that she has been changed by her experience with Galaad and the Holy Grail? Why or why not?
The main idea of the text is to depict ambitions and the obstacles that build before them. Tessa is a character that believes planning ahead makes for every decision to go well in the future, and despite her prediction of stormy weather - since she<u> "is not an amateur planner"</u> -, turns out to not being able to work around that predicament very well.
Varick is a character who knows how to handle hindrances, turning them benefitial to his own work; he prefers to <u>"just go with the flow"</u>, as the text states. Tessa, initially unwilling, learns from this behaviour nearly at the end otf the story, which helps accomplish her task. This is evidence by the last sentence in the text,<u> "His perchant for turning obstacles into oppotunities had provided the necessary influence to save - perhaps even improve - her film."</u>
