Answer:
America won
Explanation:
America, France, and Spain all won. Britain was outraged that they had lost, and the successful american revolution would spark many more of its kind in the future. Native Americans fought on both sides of the war, and you were better off looking for freedom on the British side as many Americand mistreated native americans.
It is b Japan because it is the only one that has a similar feudal system with Europe
Answer:
B) more soldiers enlisted in the Continental army.
Explanation:
The Ming Dynasty came to an end as the Ariel Aisin-Gioroinvaded the mainland China and took over the original Ming government.
The course:
In 1644, the army of Ariel Aisin-Gioro infiltrated the mainland, soon took over Beijing,the Capital of Ming Dynasty.
A new emperor of Ariel Aisin-Gioro was then crowned as the absolute ruler of China, and the called the dynasty “Ching dynasty”.
Factors causing the end to Ming Dynasty:
The extremely one-sided power of emperor-
The emperors were very suspicious on their officials and helpers might took over their place.
Policies were then carry out to concentrate the ruling power to the emperor only.
However,this came with heavy duties as well, once the one who inherited the role of absolute ruler was not hard-working enough, the government’s ruling would go down the slope.
The treatment towards the officials- the Ming emperor treated their officials very harshly as they wanted to show their supremacy.
The officials had to kneel before the emperor when they talk no matter who they are. They also had to call themselves “slaves” before the ruler, and whenever they did some mthing that upset the emperor they might get beaten, sometimes to death.
Given the situation,the officials tried their best not to interfere with ruling lest getting punished. This caused the ruling to be ineffective without the help of officials. Causing the ruling to went down hill eventually.
Hope it helps!
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. <span>The creation of separate quality departments in the early 1900s caused indifference to quality among workers and their managers. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
