Answer:
The claim that the current work teams can build room additions quicker than the time allotted for by the contract has strong statistical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to test the hypothesis to prove the claim that the work team can build room additions quicker than the time allotted for by the contract.
The null hypothesis is that the real time used is equal to the contract time. The alternative hypothesis is that the real time is less thant the allotted for by the contract.

The significance level, as a storng evidence is needed, is α=0.01.
The estimated standard deviation is:

As the standard deviation is estimated, we use the t-statistic with (n-1)=15 degrees of freedom.
For a significance level of 0.01, right-tailed test, the critical value of t is t=2.603.
Then, we calculate the t-value for this sample:

As the t-statistic lies in the rejection region, the null hypothesis is rejected. The claim that the current work teams can build room additions quicker than the time allotted for by the contract has strong statistical evidence.
It depends on how many football cards and basket ball cards you have
Carla can babysit for 5 hours and tutor for 7 hours or babysit for 8 hours and tutor for 5.5 hours
<h3>How to graph the inequality?</h3>
Let x represents hours babysitting and y represents hours tutoring
So, we have:
Earnings = Rate of babysitting * x + Rate of tutoring* y
This gives
Earnings = 5x + 10y
He wants to earn at least $95.
This means that:
5x + 10y ≥ 95
See attachment for the graph of the inequality
From the attached graph, two possible solutions are: (5, 7) and (8, 5.5)
This means that Carla can babysit for 5 hours and tutor for 7 hours or babysit for 8 hours and tutor for 5.5 hours
Read more about inequalities at:
brainly.com/question/25275758
#SPJ1
Multiply both sides by 7:
-4x > 70
Divide both sides by -4 and remember to switch the inequality sign.
x < -15