Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Compare the interview "On the Front Lines with Thurgood Marshall" with the informational piece "'Equal Justice Under Law': Thurgood Marshall". What key information is expanded on in the interview that is not deeply explored in the informational piece?
The interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair. The interview provides a more detailed account of the Supreme Court's opinion on Brown v. Board of Education. The interview includes Marshall's own struggle to get into law school which fueled his sense of injustice. The interview mentioned more about the opposition Marshall faced in the African American community.
Answer:
The interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair.
Explanation:
The interview is more detailed, as it shows the experience of a person who knows in depth, as he witnessed the effects of segregation on education. Through the interview, we were able to see the text information applied in the real world, which allows an extension of the meaning of the text's arguments. In summary, we can say that while the text provides the facts, the interview provides Marshall's insights and motivations.
Answer:
According to Clarke, “many of the water sources have been depleted.”
Explanation:
only one that makes sense
It focuses on the alienation one feels when he is in a different
environment as well the feelings that he can’t express regarding an incident
where something happened. Nick is also
trying to find himself in this new situation where people get hurt or get
killed. He identifies himself more with
the major and the boy because they do not talk much about their wounds and
their medals. He also shares the same
cynical view that the treatments will make things better.
