Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Compare the interview "On the Front Lines with Thurgood Marshall" with the informational piece "'Equal Justice Under Law': Thurgood Marshall". What key information is expanded on in the interview that is not deeply explored in the informational piece?
The interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair. The interview provides a more detailed account of the Supreme Court's opinion on Brown v. Board of Education. The interview includes Marshall's own struggle to get into law school which fueled his sense of injustice. The interview mentioned more about the opposition Marshall faced in the African American community.
Answer:
The interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair.
Explanation:
The interview is more detailed, as it shows the experience of a person who knows in depth, as he witnessed the effects of segregation on education. Through the interview, we were able to see the text information applied in the real world, which allows an extension of the meaning of the text's arguments. In summary, we can say that while the text provides the facts, the interview provides Marshall's insights and motivations.
