Answer:
a random & coincidental occurrence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.
Certain geographic plains were more fertile than flat plains and had a run off system naturally that was great for agricultural
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
B because it is the only word meaning cause and effect
Answer:
Open public libraries so women can be more educated
