Answer:
Option (i) is the correct answer to the following question.
Explanation:
Because to achieve the strong scaling then, we have required the Amdahl’s law and the scalability is the weak scaling that is easier to instate than the powerful scaling scalability because of only Amdahl’s law.
So, that's why the following option is correct.
Option (ii) is incorrect because usually, there no communication among the procedures.
Option (iii) is incorrect because the following option is not related to the following statement.
Option (iv) is incorrect because the dependency of the data or information is decreased.
It can be noisy and distracting to students to listen to audio speakers when there are multiple computers in the classroom. Headphones help the students
ARPANET would not carry it
Answer:
Following are the statement:
counterPointer = &counter;
Explanation:
The following statement is correct because in the question it is given that there is an integer data type variable i.e., "counter" and there is another integer data type pointer variable i.e., "counterPointer" and finally we write a statement in which the pointer variable points to the integer variable.
It’s real my easy you can use a calculator or an online converter. Or division
(111001)₂ = (1 × 2⁵) + (1 × 2⁴) + (1 × 2³) + (0 × 2²) + (0 × 2¹) + (1 × 2⁰) = (57)₁₀
(1100000)₂ = (1 × 2⁶) + (1 × 2⁵) + (0 × 2⁴) + (0 × 2³) + (0 × 2²) + (0 × 2¹) + (0 × 2⁰) = (96)₁₀
(1010101)₂ = (1 × 2⁶) + (0 × 2⁵) + (1 × 2⁴) + (0 × 2³) + (1 × 2²) + (0 × 2¹) + (1 × 2⁰) = (85)₁₀
(1001000)₂ = (1 × 2⁶) + (0 × 2⁵) + (0 × 2⁴) + (1 × 2³) + (0 × 2²) + (0 × 2¹) + (0 × 2⁰) = (72)₁₀
