1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vsevolod [243]
3 years ago
10

What was the result of growing nationalism and pan-Africanist on European-African relations?

History
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. Africans were encouraged to seek independence from Europe.

Explanation:

As nationalism on the African continent and the pan africanist feeling arose the African people started believing more and more and with this the Africans started believed that they could and should govern their own governments and keep the resoruces and wealth that their countries could produce for themselves, this made them seek their independence from European empires and start their own countries.

You might be interested in
Which British policy convinced many American colonists to want to form their
shtirl [24]
The correct answer is C. Great Britain did not allow the colonists to participate in government
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The house of burgess was the representative body of Virginia.
ivann1987 [24]
True. It is the Virginia House of Burgesses that was the first legislative assembly elected in the US

hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which Russian tsar refused to surrender to Napoleon in 1812, even after Moscow had been captured and burned?
Levart [38]
It was "Alexander I" who was the Russian Tsar who refused to surrender to Napoleon in 1812, even after Moscow had been captured and burned, since he suspected (correctly) that Napoleon's army would not be able to endure. 
3 0
3 years ago
What sort of action was the declaration trying to justify
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

our right to justify against the government who cant guarantee our rights

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources
JulijaS [17]
There's no answer choices listed, so here's the best I can do:

Secondary sources come from people who have only read or heard about an event, so there is a possibility that they don't know the full story or they will mix in lies. With a primary source, you will get the full story and the truth.

Hope I'm not too late, and I hope this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Hoover’s belief that Americans should maintain their individualism affect his response to the Depression?
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the mexican government think they could win a war against the united states?
    8·1 answer
  • If you were living in Canada in 1938, you might not have been able to change immigration policy. What would you have done, as a
    10·1 answer
  • how did the literature of Plato and Aristotle's contribute to the development of Western political thought
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the dictator seized by the united states for drug trafficking?
    15·2 answers
  • Four states that allowed slavery, Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware - remained in the union.
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the grievance For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of ou
    9·1 answer
  • What is the name of the writing system of the ancient Egyptians?​
    15·1 answer
  • The first focus of French involvement in the Americas was centered on Treasures like the Spanish had obtained Fur trading using
    5·2 answers
  • HELP I'M BEING TIMED!!! The federal government expanded the national parks system due to
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!