1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sati [7]
3 years ago
10

A question a critical reader might ask is

History
1 answer:
kiruha [24]3 years ago
7 0
B. why did the author write this
You might be interested in
denied powers such as restricting freedom of speech are given to: a.both the Federal and state government s B. nethier the Feder
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

B. Neither the federal government nor the state governments can restrict ones freedom of speech as long as it does not incite violence, thats the whole point of the first amendment

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. the lack of resource<br> (10 Points)<br> Supply<br> Demand<br> Scarcity
svetlana [45]
The answer is Scarcity
8 0
3 years ago
Why did Radical Republicans pass the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment?
Damm [24]

Answer:

The Radical Republicans believed blacks were entitled to the same political rights and opportunities as whites.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What was the model Rutherford used to describe an atom?
solniwko [45]
"Nuclear atom" or "planetary model of the atom".
8 0
3 years ago
In the late 1800s, after treaties and reservations failed, the United States Army went to war with American Indians in the West.
Georgia [21]
I’ll give you two:

Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.

No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Discoveries in which field of science contributed most to the population booms of the 1800s
    8·1 answer
  • Skinny Streets" have been proven to be safer for pedestrians and cars alike.
    5·2 answers
  • How many people died in the attack of 911?
    7·2 answers
  • WHich of the following has increased in the Caucasus and Central Asia since the collapse of the Soviet Union?
    13·1 answer
  • What feature of Quakerism did Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony find most contentious?
    7·1 answer
  • How did Hitler and the Nazi Party gain support in the Weimar Republic?
    13·1 answer
  • The only way for politics to affect government is through elections true or false?
    13·1 answer
  • Now that you know more about why World War I broke out and how the terms of peace were intended to prevent it from happening aga
    15·1 answer
  • ANSWER ASAP!!!
    11·2 answers
  • Which region do you think was positioned for the most economic success during the remainder of the 1800s? Explain your answer. N
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!