Answer:
The important of people participation Is that he or she can give his opinion about the theme
Answer:
Yes, the employer misused the incentive program.
Explanation:
There are 2 important factors to consider in this case.
1. Tyra did not violate the company safety rules.
2. Tyra reported her injury directly to the employer,
Based on this facts, we can determine that the employer incurred in a violation of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 29 § 1904.35(b)(1)(iv) which states that the employer will not discriminate or discharge an employee for work-related injuries in which the employee was following safety rules.
The Occupational Safety & Health Issues agency also declared that "rate-based incentive programs are also permissible under § 1904.35(b)(1)(iv) as long as they are not implemented in a manner that discourages reporting", in this case, Tyra may be discouraged to report a future injury, because that could cause her co-workers to lose their cash prize, and maybe for loyalty to them she will prefer to remain silent.
Answer: C
Explanation: "C" would be an example of an entrepreneur because he's taking the risk of opening up another computer repair shop across town.
Entrepreneurs take risks and in this case, the risk is
that it doesn't work out and he owes money for opening the store.
Answer:
As the judge, i would do my duty and sentence the two of them according to the severity of their crimes and past criminal record.
Explanation:
I would pass the sentence on both men as deemed by law. The length of their prison sentence is largely dependent on the past criminal record (if any) and any other factor i feel is necessary to be considered such as show of remorse and circumstances leading to the crime committed.
My judgement would in no way be affected by the length of the trial of either men. If any of them has a past criminal record, he would get a tougher sentence for being a repeated offender, if the co-defendant has no prior record, his sentence would be less because he's a first time offender.
The infliction of mental suffering is usually easier to detect than other forms of abuse. This statement is True
<h3>
What is Mental suffering?</h3>
- Mental suffering, sometimes known as "mental anguish," is the discomfort, dysfunction, or misery of the mind; it typically follows bodily pain or injury.
- It also refers to emotional distress brought on by another person's actions, including extremely unpleasant feelings like worry, despair, sorrow, grief, horror, shame, or rage.
- It is significant to remember that discomfort, whether mental or emotional, is typically brought on by an outside source and, when severe enough, may serve as a foundation for suing for damages in a tort case.
- As long as it is reasonable to assume that mental trauma would naturally result from the incident, physical injuries is typically not required in order to obtain damages for mental suffering.
- The objective test for determining whether such an assumption is acceptable calls for a cap on compensation for non-economic damages of between $250,000 and $500,000 for all non-economic damages.
To know more about mental suffering with the given link brainly.com/question/10449105
#SPJ4
