1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
artcher [175]
3 years ago
12

It is not the mission of the United States to set right everything that is amiss all over the world, even if we have interests i

nvolved, or to take part in remodelling the government of some four hundred millions of people who deeply resent foreign interference with their affairs. The author of this statement is expressing his support for:__________.
(1) war as an instrument of foreign policy
(2) the policy of imperialism
(3) business investment in foreign countries
(4) the principle of noninvolvement
History
2 answers:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the principle of non-involvement

Explanation:

The non-intervention rule is a principle of international law that restricts the ability of outside nations to interfere with the internal affairs of another nation. At its core, the principle is a corollary to the right of territorial sovereignty possessed by each nation.

aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

(1) war as an instrument of foreign policy

Explanation:

Josiah Quincy: China and Russia (1900)

When the Boxer Rebellion erupted against the presence of foreign nations on Chinese soil, England, France, Germany, Russia,

and the United States dispatched a rescue expedition (including 2,500 American troops) to protect their citizens living in China.

Fearing that some of the competing Western powers might take advantage of the volatile situation to seize Chinese territory,

Hay decided to expand America's commitment to China to include the preservation of Chinese territorial and administrative

integrity as well as commercial equality. He failed to realize the long-range significance of such a commitment. In 1900 Josiah

Quincy, formerly first assistant United States secretary of state, criticized Hay and McKinley for committing the United States

to policies it could not enforce.

You might be interested in
Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain?
juin [17]
The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.

The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
3 0
3 years ago
What was Reconstruction?
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

B. The rebuilding of everything that was damaged in the war

Explanation:

Reconstruction basically means rebuilding if I'm not wrong, so they are reconstructing things that were damaged

6 0
3 years ago
Compared to the Grange, the Farmers’ Alliances of the late 1800s
yanalaym [24]
They were more politically motivated
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Hitler turn on Stalin
Phantasy [73]

Answer:

He  attacked him.

Explanation:

He did it during the winter but it was not a good idea.

6 0
3 years ago
What role does the president play in amending the constitution?
Musya8 [376]
The United States president can take two actions in amending the constitution.

1) The president can introduce legislation. This means he/she can propose an idea they want added to the constitution. It is then up to Congress to vote and pass the proposed legislation.

2) The president can use a veto in order to stop an amendment from being added to the constitution.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Foreign policies used to promote peace in the world )Which of these attempts at maintaining peace in the world was the most succ
    13·1 answer
  • n an effort to deal with an increasing number of immigrants, in 1892 the U.S. government A) banned all immigrants into the count
    9·2 answers
  • Tribes of people that helped bring about the collapse of rome
    8·1 answer
  • How did the conquerors treat the native population?
    8·2 answers
  • Why Didn't Carnegie not pay his workers more, even though he could?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the goals of the Jamestown colonies differ from those of the Puritan colonies in Massachusetts?
    12·1 answer
  • What was a long-term result of the growth of cash crop farming in America
    15·1 answer
  • 1) With which of these politicians would Robert M. La Follette have had the MOST in common?
    9·1 answer
  • Who signed a treaty to give up all Creek lands in Georgia; murdered by Creek?
    7·1 answer
  • Passages from which two texts reflect a shift in how the British colonies/United States wrote about indigenous people but not in
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!