Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Answer:
Answer is option D, i.e. Information on credit worthiness.
Explanation:
When any organization enters into a contract with an applicant, it often asks for recommendations before awarding that contract to the applicant. This recommendations is asked to assess about the skills, the abilities that the applicant possess, the integrity and the character of the applicant. This is to assess that whether the applicant is fit and worthy enough to be awarded the contract. Thus, credit worthiness is not accounted for while going through the recommendations. Therefore, the answer is option D.
Usually to support a cause for a good reason hope this helps!