<span>The clinician will next gather any relevant information about the client, such as information from family members and people close to the client. This will allow the clinician to make a more thorough diagnosis and better understand any variables that might be working for or against the person.</span>
Answer:
B. =PV(.06,10,0,10000)
Explanation:
In MS Excel the formula of Present value re is as "=PV( rate, nper, pmt, [fv] )".
PV = Present value
rate = Interest rate= 6% = 0.06
nper = number of periods = 10
pmt = payment made each period = 0 in this scenario
fv = future value = 10,000
So, according to the formula the correct sequence is =PV(.06,10,0,10000)
which is correctly mentioned in option B.
Marietta is a part of A WORK GROUP.
The correct option is B.
A work group is made up of members, who can represent one unit or department and these members work independently but at the end of the day they pool their outputs together. The characteristic feature of work groups include the following: individual accountability, focus is on individual goals, production of individual work product, defined individual roles, tasks and responsibilities, etc.
Answer:
Free cash flow = $2.25 million.
Explanation:
We know,
Free cash flow = Operating income ×( 1 - tax rate) + depreciation - net working capital.
Given,
free cash flow = ?
Operating income = $2.75 million
tax rate = 40%.
depreciation = $1.20 million.
net working capital = $0.6 million.
Putting the values into the formula, we can get
Free cash flow = [Operating income ×( 1 - tax rate) + depreciation - net working capital] million.
Free cash flow = [$2.75 ×( 1 - 40%) + $1.20 - $0.6] million.
Free cash flow = ($2.75 × 0.6 + $1.20 - $0.6) million.
Free cash flow = ($1.65 + $1.20 - $0.6) million.
Free cash flow = ($2.85 - $0.6) million.
Free cash flow = $2.25 million.
Answer:
Correct option is E.
A lack of communication
Explanation:
It is an instance of two societies speaking with one another. Add to social contrast, there are even language contrasts. To think at an exceptionally fundamental level, the Japanese here are most likely confronting language as well as unfit to fathom American business culture.
Despite the fact that these things are likely while managing in global exchange, the most ideal approach to improve correspondence is to see each other's way of life and modify the language and correspondence tone in like manner. Along these lines, there is absence of compelling correspondence between the American and the Japanese.