1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harlamova29_29 [7]
3 years ago
8

How did the way in which Islamic leaders dealt with religious minorities differ from the tactics used by Christian leaders?

History
2 answers:
amm18123 years ago
4 0
A--Islamic tolerance and Christian conversion were how the two empires addressed religions during empire building. 

The Islamic empires often used systems of tolerance allowing for multiple religions to exist in their empire. At times, they would impose taxes on differing religions but rarely were people forced to give up their religion. For Christians, conversion was important. As they built empires in Asia, Africa, and the Americas, native peoples were forced to convert to Christian religions. 
lys-0071 [83]3 years ago
4 0

A. Islamic leaders often allowed other religions to practice freely, whereas Christian leaders often allowed only Christianity to be practiced.

You might be interested in
The Revolutionary war also took place at sea. Britain had a very powerful 2 points
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

a blockade

Explanation:

it is a block

8 0
3 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Which document was influential in providing rights such as the rule of law and fair trial by jury?
slava [35]
Trial by Jury. The right to a trial by jury, one of the most time-honored inheritances from Magna Carta in United States law, refers to the guarantee that courts will depend on a body of citizens to render judgments in most civil and criminal cases.
8 0
3 years ago
Which form of commercial speech was ruled to be protected by the Constitution in a Supreme Court decision?
Andru [333]
Prescription drug advertising
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was a major cause of the Tuscarora War? O Tribal lands were being overrun by white settlers. O Tribal leaders kidnapped an
Over [174]

Answer:

Tribal lands were being overrun by white settlers

Explanation:

In 1711 White settlers took over tribal lands for livestock, crops, and housing. They also captured and enslaved the Tribals.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which mountain range is located in northern Afghanistan?
    9·2 answers
  • What can you determine about Mexico's climate by looking at this list of Mexico's largest crops? A) the weather is warm B) the w
    15·2 answers
  • How are the civil service system and the merit system connected?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes how muckrakers brought about reform in the progressive Era?
    8·2 answers
  • Under the system of sharecropping, contracts usually favored... 1)Landowners 2)Laborers 3)Freedmen 4)The gov.
    6·2 answers
  • How many years did it take to make the machine gun after the revolver was invented?
    15·1 answer
  • Why were Robert Peary's notes from his trip to the North Pole so important?
    9·1 answer
  • What was Martin Luther King Jr's famous speech?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the englightment change the way people thought about and viewed the role of government?
    13·1 answer
  • According to the slave codes, enslaved African Americans could not
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!