The first statement doesn't reffer necessarily to a right/ not right theoretical dilema while the second statement describes a scientific half truth cause the cells are not generated by chlorophyl and the plants do not need just the sun light to grow. So, even if it's not right for the children to know over the trash can while cycling, it might be true while saying that the plant cells are grnerated by chlorophyl it's neither right or wrong, it's not scientifically accurate.
Eat a variety of foods that are high in vitamins every day.
to secrete a salty, watery fluid from the sweat glands of the skin; <span>sweat.</span>
Answer:
It is a conditional syllogism
Explanation:
It is a conditional syllogism. In a conditional system the statement goes as follows: “If A is true then B is also true”. The conclusion of a conditional syllogism is simple, and it could be inferred by the statement. In this example, the statement goes: "If I get eight hours of sleep, I will feel rested in the morning. I will sleep for eight hours tonight. Therefore, I will feel rested in the morning. "If I get eight hours of sleep” is statement A. “I will feel rested in the morning” is statement B. Consequently, if A is true then B is also true: “I will sleep for eight hours tonight. Therefore, I will feel rested in the morning”.
