Answer:
Ideally, the drunk driver who hit them while he was driving on the wrong lane is liable for the damages and not McLaughlin since he was sober and civil.
Explanation:
Liability for damages resulting from car accident usually falls on a negligent driver an din this case, McLaughlin is not the negligent one.
However, the situation is tricky here since he is not the owner of the car.
The majority of car accidents are caused by driver negligence, poor road conditions, or a problem or defect with one of the automobiles involved.
If his friend has a car insurance, that will cover for the damages as well.
And if the drunk driver finds a way to escape with a strong case, and in the absence of a car insurance, McLaughlin might be obligated to pay for the damages since the car was borrowed.
The tax consequence of the distribution sent to this employee is that the Distribution is subject to federal income tax withholding.
What are the typical fees banks charge?
Answer: A. Camry
Explanation:
Toyota's quality problems in the United States were signaled with a recall in late 2009 for problems with floor mats, but they didn't end there. Since then, more than 20 million cars have been recalled
Increasingly, evidence suggests that Toyota's culture—or even the cars it produces—is not the source of the problem. A 2011 report released by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) concluded that unintended acceleration was not caused by problems in the electronic circuitry.
Answer:
Current Ratio = 1.5
Working Capital = $2,000 million
Explanation:
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
= ($1,200 + $1,500 + $2,000 + $1,300) / ($1,000 + $3,000)
= $6,000 / $4,000
= 1.5
Working Capital = Current Assets - Current Liabilities
= $6,000 million - $4,000 million
= $2,000 million
