Answer:
Explanation:
For computing the cost of inventorying, we have to apply the formula which is shown below:
= Total costs ÷ Number of items
1. Cost of inventorying = Total costs ÷ Number of items
= $125 ÷ 100 items
= $1.25
Total cost = $100 + $25 = $125
2. Cost of inventorying = Total costs ÷ Number of items
= $150 ÷ 150 items
= $1
Total cost = $100 + $25 + $25 = $150
3. Cost of inventorying = Total costs ÷ Number of items
= $175 ÷ 160 items
= $1.10
Total cost = $100 + $25 + $25 + $25 = $175
$25 is the each worker pay
To minimize the cost we required two workers as the cost of inventorying is lesser than other two.
I believe the answer is B. policies
Answer:
a. Delivery service (product) costs = $44,120
b. Period costs = $20,560
Explanation:
a) Delivery service (product) costs
Indirect materials $7,100
Depreciation on delivery equipment $11,900
Dispatcher's salary $5,810
Gas and oil for delivery trucks $2,700
Drivers' salaries $16,300
Delivery equipment repairs <u>$310 </u>
Total <u>$44,120</u>
b) Period costs
Property taxes on office building $950
CEO's salary $12,100
Advertising $5,500
Office supplies $700
Office utilities $1,100
Repairs on office equipment <u>$210 </u>
Total <u>$20,560</u>
Answer:
demographics
Explanation:
Here gender and age is being used for targeting -email campaign which is indicator of use of demography. Demography segmentation is based on segmentation of potential consumer based on age, gender, race, income, ethnicity and other demographic characteristic. reason behind us of demography in marketing is based on premise that people of a particular demography exhibit similar purchasing behavior to a larger extent.
Answer: Yes it does.
Explanation:
The Statute of Frauds holds that there are some contracts including real estate contracts that need to be in written form and then signed to be binding. Some of those contracts include, contracts of sale of goods worth more than $500 as well as contracts that cannot be completed within a year.
We can agree that the trees and top soil are definitely over $500 in value and so this falls under the Statute.
The main bone of contention here however, is probably if the Electronic signature that Hardell used to signed the memorandum entitles the aggrement to legal protection under the Statue of Frauds which requires a signature.
The answer is yes.
The United States Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act is a federal law. A main provision of this Act is to give electronic signatures the same significance as handwritten signatures. This law is meant to apply to wherever US Federal law applies including states, and US territories. States generally have the right to either accept this law or follow a similar one called the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (‘UETA’) which was passed in 1999 and bestows upon Electronic contracts, similar status as paper contracts.
The Electronic signature used by Hardell therefore falls under the Statute of Frauds.
