Answer:
D. $220,000
Explanation:
In order to calculate the selling price of each of the remaining 6 homes, we need to do the following calculations shown below:
As the average of 15 homes is $200,000 each. Therefore, the total price would be
= $200,000 × 15
= $3,000,000
Now for 4 houses, the selling price would be
= $170,000 × 4
= $680,000
And for 5 homes, the selling price would be
= $200,000 × 4
= $1,000,000.
Now the selling price for 6 homes would be
= $3,000,000 - $680,000 - $1,000,000
= $1,320,000
And the average would be
= $1,320,000 ÷ 6 homes
= $220,000
Answer:
c. Purchase cost of existing machine
Explanation:
Relevant costs are the incremental costs that can be avoided by avoiding the functional activity with which the costs are associated.
Maintenance costs are relevant as they are directly linked to the use of machinery and as such are incremental with the use. The same is the case with the maintenance costs of the existing machine as they are avoidable if the new machine is purchased.
Expected cost savings would be incremental with the improved new machine. These cost savings thus are relevant.
Resale value of existing machine are also relevant as these would contribute towards the purchase of new machine.
The purchase price of existing machine is irrelevant as the machine cost has already been paid and regardless of purchasing the new machine or not, this cost is not a part of any calculations.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
![M_1 = $3111](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M_1%20%3D%20%243111)
![M_2 = $12409](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M_2%20%3D%20%2412409)
Explanation:
Given data:
Amount of currency held = $1347 billion
checkable deposit $1347 billion
saving deposit $8189 billion
small time deposit $400 billion
market fund $709 billion
Saving deposit in the form M2 and M1
M_1 = currency held as individual and traveller check + checkable deposit
= $1347 + $1764
![M_1 = $3111](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M_1%20%3D%20%243111)
M_2 = M_1 + saving deposit _ time deposit + maket funds
= $3111 + $8189 + $400 + $709
![M_2 = $12409](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M_2%20%3D%20%2412409)
This would be an example of an negative.
I'm not 100% sure if that's what you're looking for?
But the waste from the steel factor is killing the fish, so it's definitely a negative impact.
Answer:
Would unregulated markets produce too much or too little of Good X and Good Y, compared to the efficient output levels for these products?
Explanation:
Good X: Too Little
Good Y: Too Much