<u>Presidents Hoover, who was in office when the financial crash took place in 1929, was an advocate of laisez-faire economic measures</u>, that consisted on free functioning of the markets with minimum goverment interventionism. He supported that markets alone, would produce the most efficent outcomes. Therefore he simply introduced austherity measures that would save costs (for example, reduce public expending) to limit public debt. His policies were characterized by the minium goverment intervnetionism.
Subsequently, the package of measures known as the<u> New Deal, based on Keynesian economics and goverment interventionism, was implemented by President Roosevelt along the 1930s decade</u>. The New Deal aimed to create job positions for the large unemployed sectors of the US population, by increasing public expenditure (one of the variables of the fiscal policy) and by investing the funds in public works. This would create job positions and hence, improve employment figures and boost demand levels, creating a trend towards economic recovery.
I think Foreign aid helps fight AIDS and other diseases like Ebola. It is used to respond to disasters in some of the world's poorest countries. Food aid is reaching the vulnerable in South Sudan and other countries affected by a hunger crisis. International assistance feeds, educates and keeps children healthy. No for the second question because you don’t know if that person will be willing to do the same for you and your country.
While the Continental Army lose the Battle of Bunker Hill, they still gained a tremendous confidence boost. Because of this, the Continental Army was able to win the next battle, the Battle of Gloucester.
