Answer:
I believe your answer would be so the character can directly share his or her thoughts with the reader.
Explanation:
A is the only option that makes sense because choice B would be Third-Person omniscient, while C would most likely be either Third-Person omniscient or limited. Either way, First-Person shares the narrator's point of view, so the reader cannot know more than the character does.
<em>♥A.W.E.</em><u><em>S.W.A.N.</em></u><em>♥</em>
Answer:
An argument relies on a comparison of two things
Explanation:
Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren’t really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
Analogy: a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
I don't see any options, but if there is a "clue" that states that using words like "Finally, next, now" and so on is how you can cell that an author is using chronological order, I'd choose that one.
I sincerely hoped that helped, have a good day.
Answer:schools needed to desegregate
Explanation:
Answer:
examine is examines. Reread it with the correction.
Explanation:
Reread the sentence. What is the Subject? Generation. What is the Generation doing it examines.