lolk cjs cls cvjdfn v dvaf efpjkf kefnef kfqnfef;
d. would result in tax increases and lead to a financial crisis
Answer:
Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he <em><u>held a federal license to do business.</u></em>
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a case of a territorial issue where the two parties tried to gain superior authority over the rights involved. This court case set the precedent for how state and federal powers are entertained.
Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons were former partners in the steamboat industry. So, when Gibbons got his own steamboat to operate, the issue of who can ply in the waterways became an issue. Ogden has a state permit while Gibbons's was a federal permit.
When Gibbons operates his steamboat on the waterways of New York, Ogden opposed, claiming that Gibbons has no permit. This case became a fight between the state and federal powers, with the issue of who was to have a higher power. And the court agreed or dictated that the federal government has control or precedence over the state.
So, <u>Gibbons won the case because of his federal licence against Ogden's state licence</u>.
Terms of Surrender
Explain:
The terms of the surrender were generous: Confederate soldiers would have to turn in their rifles, but they could return home immediately and keep their horses or mules. They were also given food as many of them were very hungry.
The correct answer is an extension of the Missouri compromise.
. Polk favored the idea of extending the Missouri Compromise which would have excluded slavery from present-day Washington, Oregon, Utah, Idaho, Nevada, and the northern half of California while allowing it in what is now New Mexico, Arizona, and southern California.
