Answer:
Slavery, territorial crisis, nationalism
Explanation:
In the early nineteenth century the US had a dual structure - capitalism in the north and slavery in the south. These two structures were completely contradictory structures within a single state. During the American-Mexican War, the United States seized most of the land in the south. There was a lot of empty land here. The favorable climate in the southern part contributed to the development of the agrarian sector, especially cotton growing. The fact that the immigrants mostly went north created a working minority here. Therefore, from the seventeenth century onwards, blacks were brought here from Africa. In the South, 1/4 of the whites were slaves.
The development of machine-building in the north and the development of the agrarian sector in the South made the interrelationships between these two regions necessary. The South needed new technologies, and the North needed ready-made tobacco and cotton. But the difference between the structures was that they were saying their word seriously in relationships. The liberation of fleeing slaves and the emergence of new structures in the newly occupied territories led to the outbreak of civil war. Some 620,000 people were killed during the war
Are you talking about the French and Indian War, or what war are you asking about?
Tariffs on imports
The 1920s presidents began a system of tariffs on imported good to encourage spending on American goods only. However, with no trade, European countries were unable to make money.
Tariffs are taxes on imported goods. This is a common economic policy of conservatives.
The best option regarding the Hellenistic period would be that "<span>The period was marked by the blending of Greek culture with ideas from Persia, Egypt, and Central Asia," since this was a time of significant growth in both the arts and sciences in the Mediterranean region. </span>
