Answer:
I can't see the picture right, it's backward sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
edit the picture and take a better one
17,19,23 are the prime numbers
Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
Answer: 12a.) slope is 125, y-intercept is 50 (started at 50 ft)
12b.) f(3) = 425 feet
12c.) 3.6 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
12a.) The slope equation is y = mx+b, where m is the slope, and b is the y intercept.
12b.) to find f(3) you could either plug it into the equation given (125x+50) or pretend there is a vertical line at 3 on the x axis, and where it crosses the line given would be the answer.
12c.) He is climbing a 500 ft cliff, and according to the graph, it takes him 3.6 hours to do it. Another way to find this answer would be to find f(3.6), which is indeed 500 ft.
Hope this helps!
Answer: f(x) = x-7
explanation: the function is already being translated down 5, so subtracting 2 more units leaves you with this new equation
