Homeless:
10 – t^2
/320 > 0
10 > t^2
/320
3200 > t^2
t < 40√2 = 56.6
College students:
10 – t^2
/160 > 0
10 > t^2
/160
1600 > t^2
t < 40
Wait time would have to be at least 40 minutes to prevent college students from waiting.
Answer:
Investor A = $545216 .
Investor B = $352377
Investor C = $897594
Explanation:
Annual rate ( r ) = 9.38%
N = 41 years
<u> Calculate the balance at age of 65</u>
1) For Investor A
balance at the end of 10 years
= $2000 (FIA, 9.38 %, 10) (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $33845
Hence at the end of 65 years ( balance )
= $33845 (FIP, 9.38 %, 31) ≈ $545216 .
2) For investor B
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 31) = $322159 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $352377
3) For Investor C
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 41) = $820620 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $897594
Answer:
tickets were sold to student and 
tickets were sold to adults
Explanation:
Let the number of tickets purchased by students be "X" and the number of tickets purchased by adults be "Y"
Given
Total number of tickets sold 
Total amount collected by selling 
tickets 
dollar
Cost of one ticket of student 
dollar
Cost of one ticket of adult 
9 dollar
Two equation are as follows
------Eq (1)
-------- Eq (2)
Multiplying eq (1) by 9 and subtracting from equation 2 we get
Substituting the value of X in equation 1 we get
Therefore, tickets were sold to student and tickets were sold to adults
Answer:
D. Ingestion
Explanation:
Absorption seems like something you would get through the skin. Injection it gets put into your body by a needle. Inhalation is through the nose. Ingestion you swallow.
Answer:
b. They are treated differently because the loss in value of Carol's stock is the result of a sale, while the loss in value of Dave's stock is simply a decline in value.
Explanation:
Although the stock owned by Carol and by Dave declines in value by $2,000, however Carol only has a realized and recognized loss of $2,000. The main factor in determining whether a disposition has taken place often whether an identifiable event has occurred. In the current scenario, Carol’s stock sale qualifies as a disposition and the Dave’s stock value decline does not qualify as a disposition and is simply a decline in value.
