Answer:
d. Overstate, understate, understate, zero
Explanation:
The amount of earnings overall is the same. so, in the end, there is n difference in retained earnings.
But, on accrual accounting, the note should not enter the accounting as 1,000 as time value of money exist.
At 2016 the sales revenue should be the present value of 1,000 dollars not the complete 1,000 dollars. Thus, is overstated.
Then, the interest accrued from the note are not recognized. Thus, the first year (2016) recognize revenues that should be matched with 2017 and 2018
Thus, these two subsequent years ended understated.
Answer:
B. 100 shares of ABC preferred stock
Explanation:
Shares are ownership stakes of a company that are given out to individuals who contribute to capital base of a company.
Preference shares are those whose owners recieve preference in payment of dividends, a fixed dividend is paid to them.
Ordinary shares recieve less preference when dividend is paid, usually coming last in divedend payment.
In this scenario ABC has decided to pay 10% stock dividend. This will be paid to ordinary share holders.
So the person with 100 preference shares will have 100 preference shares
10% of par value of $100 is 0.1 * 100= $10
Number of shares are 100 so the value is now 100 * $10 = $1,000
Since the conversion rate of preference to ordinary shares is 10:1
Number of preference shares= 1,000 ÷ 10= 100 preference shares
Command economies have public enterprises where the government controls everything including business and production. In socialism, the means of production, distribution, and exchange are owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Answer:
Court ruled over in favor of the plaintiffs.
Explanation:
The result was that the court ruled in the favor of the plaintiffs because the contractor was statutorily barred from bringing an action to enforce payment because he doesn't has the residential home builder license and the amount of the contract satisfied statutory requirements.
Answer: Justin's sponsoring broker
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Justin, a real estate salesperson with City Brokerage, received a referral fee when he refered a client to Mark, who is another real estate salesperson with City Brokerage.
The person to pay Justin his referral fee will be Justin's sponsoring broker. It should be noted that when another agents gets a referral from an agent, the sponsoring broker is the one who gives the referral fee to the referring agent.
