Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Answer:
D) firms whose average private cost is less than price will stay in (or enter) the dry cleaning
industry even though their average social cost exceeds price.
Explanation:
When there is pollution as a result of the daily business, then it involves a huge social cost, as you cause harm to public.
But company's do not consider it in making the decision for business, as it generally do not impact the business in financial matters.
As even if the average cost is less then revenue the profit will be there to run the business.
But till the moment the financial impact is not strong of the social cost the pollution will not affect.
Answer and explanation:
Althea is covered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (<em>EEOC</em>). The EEOC is an agency of the federal government of the United States that enforces federal laws regarding discrimination of <em>race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, national origin or impairment</em>. Althea was fired with the excuse that it is not "appropriate" for an African American deejay to play music on a white Christian music station. This is reason enough to sue the radio station for discrimination.
The marketplace is full of both potential and non-potential customers which makes this statement <u>True</u>.
<h3>Are both potential and non-potential customers in the market?</h3>
The market does indeed have both potential customers for a product and non-potential customers who would not want to buy the product.
As a result, it is not possible to directly market to only potential customers, but to the entire marketplace.
Find out more on potential customers at brainly.com/question/3053467.
#SPJ1
