Answer:
Luke didn't have an effective strategy to monitor his comprehension
Explanation:
Whenever people experienced failures, our first defense mechanism will most likely influence us to blame external factors rather than acknowledging there might be something wrong with the way we conduct things.
In luke's case, he might developed that view because he never really been exposed to an effective method that brought success to his test scores. Because of this, the only outcomes that he's experienced are only failures and he never really found a strategy that can work to overcome it.
To fix this, Luke need to communicate with other successful students and ask their study method in order to conduct a trial run and find which method suit him the most.
I can think of one advantage: if this party wins, it will have a majority in the parliament and senate, so it will be have more power and would not have to negotiate every voting with the other party in the coalition.
In a multiple party when coalitions , the smaller party in the coalition usually gets proportionately much more power because it can "blackmail" the bigger partner; this often stalls the voting process.
Answer:
Option b
Explanation:
In simple words, incentives refers to the additional compensation that any employee or worker receives if he or she performs their duties more than a certain level.
Organisations generally provide and offer stronger incentives to those job workers where monitoring the performance is difficult as that particular incentive motivates employees to work hard themselves.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
