Answer:
a < 3
n < 3
Step-by-step explanation:
We will solve each inequality one by one.
Solve first inequality :
3a - 4 < 5
add 4 both the side
3a < 9
divide 3 both the side
a < 3
Solve second inequality:
![\frac{n}{-3} + 5 > 4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B-3%7D%20%2B%205%20%3E%204)
subtract 5 both the side
![\frac{n}{-3} > -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B-3%7D%20%3E%20-1)
now multiply by -3 both the side and reverse the inequality sign
n < (-3)*(-1)
n < 3
That's the final answer. I hope it will help you.
Sure what are they I will help if possible.
I've got to tell you what it was about this question that made me stop,
look it over, play with it, and try to answer it: It was the size of the piece
of land involved . . . 2¹⁵ square miles. I had a funny feeling about that piece
of land, so I went and looked it up, and sure enough, it was just as I suspected.
Let me put it this way:
-- South Carolina
-- West Virginia
-- Maryland
-- Hawaii
-- Massachusetts
-- Vermont
-- New Hampshire
-- New Jersey
-- Connecticut
-- Delaware
-- Rhode Island
Not one of these 11 states has that much land inside its borders.
<span>
<span><span>
-- Panama
-- Ireland
-- Costa Rica
-- Israel
-- Denmark
-- Netherlands
-- Switzerland
-- Taiwan
-- Belgium
-- Haiti
</span></span></span>Not one of these 10 countries has that much land in it.
And ALL OF THESE PUT TOGETHER don't add up to that much land:
-- Fiji
-- Kuwait
-- Bahamas
-- Jamaica
-- Lebanon
-- Puerto Rico
But that's what the question says, so that's the way to work it.
It's only math.
=============================================
How many times does 8³ fit into 2¹⁵ ?
We need to evaluate 2¹⁵ / 8³ .
If the bases were the same, then we could simply subtract the exponents.
Notice that '8' is the same thing as 2³ .
So 8³ = (2³)³ = 2⁹ .
Now the big fraction can be written as 2¹⁵ / 2⁹ and that's <em>2⁶ </em>.
And there you are.
If you start out with 2¹⁵ square miles of land, and start giving away pieces
of 8³ square miles (slightly more land than Hong Kong) to everyone who
walks by, then by the time only 2 million people have walked by, you'll have
nothing left.
But you'll have the last laugh ! Because you can't move a piece of land,
so all those people will have to live next to each other !
As for the second part of the question (<span>Compute the actual number of pieces.),
I must confess that either it's a bogus question or else I just don't get it.
Since the dimensions of the original rectangle (roughly the same area as Belgium)
are not stated, and the pieces of 8³ square miles aren't even described as being
any particular shape, I don't really see any reason why the chopping up can't be
done in such a way that it results in exactly 2⁶ pieces. </span>
In conclusion, I'll offer the wry observation that the only tiny number associated
with this problem is the 5 points.
Answer:
x = -4/5
Step-by-step explanation:
subtract 25/6 from both sides
getting
5x = -20/5
divide by 5
x = -20/5 ÷ 5 or -20/5 × 1/5 = -20/25 = -4/5
Hey there!
The answer would be 4 FEET. If the slide is 10 feet tall and you are 6 feet down the slide then your are only 4 feet high. Just simple subtraction! So x = 4.
Hope this helps!