It would be important because the ways we are using now are not very affective
The correct option is D.
Scientific revolution refers to the principle which historians employed to explain the emergence and rapid development of modern science. The scientific revolution started in Europe at about 1543 and it brings about a great change in the way people think. During this period, people started criticizing thoughts that were previously acceptable and unchallenged; it also led to the establishment of many modern sciences.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "power plants," since many of these plants exist on the coast line for cooling purposes. </span></span>
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
