Answer:
These factores are: set point, life circumstances and intentional activity.
Which account for 50%, 10% and 40%, respectively, of the variability of happiness.
Explanation:
In the article called "Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change", Lyubomirsky et. al. (2005), propose a model for what they call chronic happiness. In this model they operationalize the concept of happiness in three measurable variables: set point, which are the genetic factors that influence a person's happiness, such as afective and personality traits. The authors found that this variable accounts for up to 50% of the entire construct.
The second variable is called life circumstances. These are the circumstantial factors that are relevant for a person's level of happines, they include demographic factors such as age, gender and ethnicity; and also life status, such as income and occupational status. The authors found that this variable accounts for only 10% of the construct.
The last variable is called intentional activity. It includes activities in which humans choose to engage in, in their everyday lives. For example, exercising, devoting time to helping others, etc. This variable accounts for 40% of the hapiness construct.
In 1947 Thor Heyerdahl sailed a simple raft from Peru to Polynesia, following the ocean currents for more than 6,000 kilometers. This statement accurately describes what Heyerdahl proved by this voyage. It would have been possible for people from ancient Peru to reach Polynesia by following ocean currents.
Answer:
Pilot project
Explanation:
Pilot project is an experimental project in an organization to study the feasibility of carrying out overall change. It is more like a test run of the organizations change move. It helps to manage the risk involved with drastic changes. If the result of the pilot project is not positive, the management can either discard the change idea of make modifications and test run the idea again.
Answer: The two types of constitutional interpretation used were; <u>Strict and loose. </u>
<u />
Explanation:
Strict interpretation is used when the text should be read precisely and the arguments are based off the text alone. Some Supreme Court Justices try to use only the text of the constitution to make their case.
Loose interpretation is also known as a broad interpretation. This type of interpretation is used when knowledge is used that isn't in the constitution. This knowledge can be based on scientific finding, past political circumstances, and history.
