Yes so good indeed queen keep it up
Answer: The first ratio, which is the current ratio have them sitting at 5.5 when the average for 2016-2017 was 1.7
Explanation:
From doing three ratios, ABC are doing well above average when it comes to the ratios carried out. The first ratio, which is the current ratio have them sitting at 5.5 when the average for 2016-2017 was 1.7 this doesn't mean they are worth meeting up with their target yet but it would require more loans and them building on what they currently have. This ratio informs them on their stand on taking more loans or not.
With an average of 2.0 in the 2016-2017 year, they are at a 1.2. The lower this ratio is the more debt they can put themselves in and not have to worry about if they could pay it off or not
Considering the situation described above, and given that Alicia does not wish to file a joint 2020 return, and she has no qualifying child or qualifying relative. The filing status Alicia should use is "<u>Married Filing Separately."</u>
<h3>What is Married Filing Separately?</h3>
Married Filing Separately is a tax status taken by married couples who prefer to record their incomes, exemptions, and deductions on separate tax returns.
Given that Alicia and her husband are still legally married, and she doesn't want to file a joint 2020 return, the other available option is "<u>Married Filing Separately."</u>
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Married Filing Separately."</u>
Learn more about tax returns here: brainly.com/question/2135349
Was an American novelist<span>, </span>short-story writer<span>, and </span>poet. <span>Farrell based his writing on his own experiences, particularly those that he included in his celebrated "Danny O'Neill Pentology" series of five novels.</span>
<span>He has committed "twisting".</span>
<span>
Twisting is intentionally putting forth deceptive
expressions that would make a insured to lapse, appoint, or end insurance
policy with a specific end goal to switch companies or policies. It is the
demonstration of initiating or endeavor to instigate a policy owner to drop a
current policy and to take another policy by utilizing deceptions or fragmented
correlations of the focal points of the two policies.</span>