"Links live forever" is very important when designing commercial internet based electronic sites. Link live forever has the following 4 important reasons:
- Customer bookmarks
- Links from other sites
- Search engine referrals
- Old content adds value
When designing an electronic internet-based site, it is important that all the links live forever. The reasons are:
- Customer bookmarks: When the website is live, customers who are interested in your specific product may bookmark that page for later use. For example, customers bookmark a link that navigates them later to that page. If the link is live, then customers visit that link/page again without any hassles.
- Links for other sites: Sometimes other sites link your link (website/page/product page) to some pages where they want to navigate the customer/visitor to their site. If the link is live, then customers/visitors easily visit your website/page/product page.
- Search Engine Referrals: Search engines rank the site on the content you are providing on the given link. When a search engine refers the visitor to your website, if it is life then the visitor will be served otherwise a dead link will disappoint both visitor and search engine.
- Old content adds value: Keeping the link of old content live adds value to your website and adds value for your user. Keeping links of old content live serves the visitors best because their interest may be renewed, searching about historical events, and searching for older information.
So, it is very important to keep the links live forever of the commercial internet-based websites.
You can learn more about commercial website at brainly.com/question/18119179
#SPJ4
Answer:
cost of direct materials purchases 160,800
Explanation:
pounds required for production 54,000
desired ending inventory 2,800
total needs 56,800
beginning inventory (3,200)
units to be purchased 53,600
cost per unit of direct materials 3
cost of direct materials purchases 160,800
<u>Notes:</u>
The pounds for production and the ending inventory are the raw materials demand.
The beginning inventory is a portion we already have, so we need to purchase less.
Then, we multiply the pounds to be purchased by their cost to get the total cost for direct materials
Answer:
It is more profitable to raise the selling price by $2.
Explanation:
To determine whether the company should raise the selling price, we need to determine the effect on income. <u>The best option is the one with the higher sales revenue.</u>
Sales revenue= selling price * number of units
<u>Current:</u>
Sales revenue= 5.5*2,200= $12,100
<u>Proposal:</u>
Sales revenue= 7.5*1,800= $13,500
It is more profitable to raise the selling price by $2.
Answer:
d. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take proper account of differences in the sizes of projects.
CORRECT As the project yields over time can differ. This generates that projects with a lower IRR can achieve a higher NPV at lower rates.
There is a crossover point after which a projects NPV are equal and from there the one with higher IRR obtains better NPV
Explanation:
a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the time value of money.
FALSE both method consider time value of money
b. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the cost of capital
FALSE The IRR can be compared against the cost of capital to indicate wether or not a project should be preferable
.c. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR values a dollar received today the same as a dollar that will not be received until sometime in the future.
FALSE IRR considers the time value of money
e. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of cash flows over a project's full life.
FALSE it considers all the cash flows over the project's full life.
Answer:
$9.94
Explanation:
Equivalent unit of conversion cost = 56,800 + (7,300*40%)
Equivalent unit of conversion cost = 56,800 + 2,920
Equivalent unit of conversion cost = 59,720 unit
Total cost of conversion = $34,558 + $559,254
Total cost of conversion = $593,812
Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = Total cost of conversion / Equivalent unit of conversion cost
Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = $593,812 / 59,720 units
Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = $9.9432686
Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = $9.94
