1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
10

When historians say they try to be objective this means all of the following EXCEPT:

History
1 answer:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
6 0

When historians say they try to be objective this means all of the following EXCEPT:

A. They use their own personal opinions to better explain the evidence. (They do not use their own personal opinions as that wouldn't make it objective)

B. They do not go beyond what the evidence indicates. (This stating they do not guess and/or fill in what they believe)

C. They present facts rather than falsehoods. (Facts do make it objective)

D. They use reliable evidence. (They have to use reliable evidence to make it factual)


The only reasonable answer is A.

You might be interested in
Identify aristotle, thomas hobbes, john locke
AlladinOne [14]

The world is full of stark dichotomies: good and evil, left and right, chocolate and vanilla - just to name a few. Political theory in the 17th century, according to many historians and philosophers, experienced a similar rift. The very nature of government and sources of power was debated and even experimented upon. Whereas today we have Democrats and Republicans arguing over these issues, in 17th-century England, the two prevailing viewpoints were best exemplified by the writings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. What significance does the woman mentioned in the video hold?
ANTONII [103]
I’m sorry but what video
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From Gettysburg; The Turning Point of the Civil War
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

<u>1. What does General Longstreet say about the enemy when he speaks with General Lee?</u>

That the enemy was anxious.  

At that time, Longstreet managed to surround the enemy's capital. The enemy was aware of this and heightened their defense because they're expecting an attack. Longstreet believed that at that time it's better to not lose cool and wait. Anxiety tend to resulted in mistakes and that's when they should strike the enemy.

<u>2. Why doesn’t General Sam Hood want to take the hill? </u>

Basically because the enemy had an <u>advantageous position</u> in the high ground. During gun fights, having high ground were extremely beneficial since it made your troops became harder to be hit.

Sam hood believed that the troops did not have enough numbers to override this disadvantages, so he didn't really want to risk it.

<u>3. Colonel Chamberlain’s men are the end of the line of the Union army. What would happen if Colonel Chamberlain’s men retreated?</u>

At that time, Colonel Chamberlain and his men had the role to hold the enemy's line and distract them. While the distraction occured, other unites of the army will flank the enemy from the side and took over the high ground.

If Chamberlain retreated, the<u> enemy wouldn't be distracted and they could see the flank far before it came</u>. This would made it impossible for the union to took the high ground.

<u>4. What did Colonel Chamberlain do when his men ran out of ammunition?</u>

After they ran out of ammunition, Colonel Chamberlain used bayonets and charge down into the two Alabama regiments. Bayonet is a knife that attached to the edge of your gun. So it kind of acting like a spear.

At that time, Chamberlain believed that his unit should hold the line at all cost in order for the union to achieve victory. Even though melee attacks was risky, he believed that it's worth the sacrifice.

8 0
3 years ago
ASAP!!
RSB [31]

Answer:

C. Form a new government.  freedom for the next question  

Explanation: Just did it on endguinuity

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which cause saw countries defend other countries and create the World War 1?
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

The real causes of World War I included politics, secret alliances, imperialism, and nationalistic pride. However, there was one single event, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, which started a chain of events leading to war.

Explanation:

happy to help ya:P

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main cause of the increasing revolts against white settlers by Native Americans?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe how the ancestors of the navajo and apache peoples arrive to the southwest uniteg states.How was the navjo culture by o
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the Boston massacre and the respond to it ?
    11·1 answer
  • At which lake dose the Mississippi find her headwater
    15·1 answer
  • Como fazer slime com dois ingrediente
    15·1 answer
  • What was an unintended negative consequence of affordable housing in the suburbs? 1 People were forced to spend more money in ne
    5·1 answer
  • What are the terms for enlightenment in each religion?
    15·1 answer
  • Briefly describe Gen. Washington’s encounter with the French at Ft. Necessity in 1754.
    5·1 answer
  • Help me please I can’t figure it out.
    11·2 answers
  • Why did charles fourier consign nasty jobs such as cleaning latrines to adolescents? Why did charles fourier consign nasty jobs
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!