Research shows that students who work at least 10 hours per week (group 1) do better academically than those who do not work (group 2).
Research has shown that working for moderate hours has been shown to assist students perform higher within the classroom, whereas working too much has been shown to own negative effects.
The rise in performance is because of an increased work-college balance that establishes structure and discipline not achieved by operating too few or too several hours. Nonetheless students should balance the advantages of organization and potency with increased stress and reduced time for socializing.
To learn more about Students here
brainly.com/question/17332524
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. extra income that a household consumes rather than saves.
Explanation:
MPC is part of the Keynesian macroeconomic theory and it is used to determine to which extent government should increase economic stimuli.
If a greater part of workers are inside the "marginal propensity to consume" then it is positive that government gives a rise in salaries, but if the majority of workers will save that extra money, then money will not be spent on consumption and money will not be returned to the Nation as taxes, more production and more employment.
Answer:
They came to explore, to make money, to spread and practice their religion freely, and to live on land of their own. The Pilgrims and Puritans came to America to practice religious freedom. ... The Pilgrims decided to settle in this area and called it Plymouth.
Explanation:
The capital of Colombia is Bogota.
Answer:
The correct option is letter B. There are other possible explanations for his results.
Explanation:
One possible explanation for the results, for instance, is the fact that all the students have already taken the same tests before. It is okay to use the same tests again but, since students already know it, they could figure out a way to do better this time. For Mr. Jacobs to be sure of his results, he should have divided his students into two groups. One group would train according to the new program and the other group wouldn't. They would be tested and have their results compared. If the experimental group - the one that used the new program - did better than the control group, then Mr. Jacobs could conclude the program works.