Answer: Kansas and Nebraska
Explanation:
Senator Stephen Douglas proposed the bill that became the Kansas-Nebraska Act as a way of getting southern support for Nebraska statehood. Douglas was seeking to bring Nebraska into the Union in order to bring those lands under government authority and lay the groundwork for building a Midwestern route of transcontinental railroad that would run to Chicago and benefit his state (Illinois). The compromise to gain support from the South was to create two states, Nebraska and Kansas, and allow voters in those areas to choose whether they'd be slave or free. The thought was that Kansas might end up as a slave state and Nebraska as a free state, thus maintaining the balance between free and slave states.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery. In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.
After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred. The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed. Kansas and Nebraska ended up as free states, but the Kansas-Nebraska Act had allowed the possibility that slavery could become slave states.
Answer:
<em>Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de' Galilei, commonly referred to as Galileo, was an astronomer, physicist and engineer, sometimes described as a polymath, from Pisa, in modern-day Italy. </em>
Answer:
The answer you are wanting is E "authorized Congress to implement a graduated income tax."
Explanation:
Hi there! Basically, the16th ammendment allowed the Congress to impose an income tax that didn't have to be divded among states due to population. In short, the government can collect income tax from <em>all </em>Americans. It gave Congress the right to impose a Federal income tax.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
.Los Angeles is facing many challenges today, none more acute than the shortage of housing. It goes beyond the basic challenge of too few homes for too many people.
As the economy grows, the demand for homes increases, but the incentive for the private sector to build homes decreases. The disincentives emerge in part because capital is more interested in chasing fast and easier returns in the stock market than in the real estate market. In large part, what makes the returns more difficult in real estate is the lack of a housing policy by local government. That is, both the public and the private sectors contribute to an environment where housing is not being built in Los Angeles.
Answer: This policy was meant to be a pressure for China to become a democratic country and to make the U.S. be seen as an role model. It was an ideological battle that USA had to grant the propaganda was being made in the right way, so they would show the strenght of their policies in an economical and social way. The biggest disadvantage was not being able to participate on tradings with a country that was changing and growing so fast it was almost becoming the largest market in the world. Economically, the U.S. had to think again on their strategies or they would face a fierce rival.
This strategy was proven to be useless since USA opened up in the 1970's for trading with China again, and this country continues to develop its economy even having a communist government. The socialist market policy didn't lead to democracy as the U.S. thought. Having this in mind, in my opinion there's no point in mantaining this kind of thought that only shows the American dream is to conquer countries by imposing their way of thinking and considering only their point of view as the right thing to do.
