Answer:
strict liability or product liability for a manufacturing defect
Explanation:
The rules of strict liability state that someone will be strictly liable – liable without a victim having to prove negligence or fault – for an accident in certain circumstances while Strict product liability laws state that a manufacturer or distributor of a defective product will owe an injured person compensation even if the defendant took reasonable steps to prevent the defect.
Explanation:
<u>To </u><u>upgrade </u><u>HDI </u><u>of </u><u>Nepal </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>following </u><u>measures </u><u>must </u><u>be </u><u>implemented </u><u>:</u>
- The health condition of the people should be improved.
- Country should attract foreign investment and technologies to bring positive changes in the sectors of human development.
- The level of education should be increased by increasing the education opportunities.
- The per capita income should be increased by enlarging employment opportunities.
- The Local means and resources should be utilized properly.
Hope I helped!
Best regards!
Answer:
option B
Explanation:
the correct answer is option B
Standard cost per unit can be calculated by multiplication of standard price with the standard quantity.
It can be explained with an example
Assume standard price of a laptop be $1000 and the standard quantity of the laptop be 8 then standard cost per unit head is
= $1000 × 8
= $ 8000
$ 8000 is the standard cost per unit.
Brinkmanship means U.S foreign policy designed to extend American control throughout the world and specifically against the Soviet Union in Europe, then the Soviet reaction was as follows. ... In Europe the Warsaw Pact established a collective security alliance protecting the Soviet Unionfrom an attack by the West
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
