Answer:
Race; ethnicity.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, race is grounded in physical attributes which are then transformed to have social meaning (Darker or lighter skin, height, facial traits, etc.). Ethnicity, on the other hand, is a cultural-historical identification with a group, just like this explains, an identity. An ethnic group is a group of people who identify with eachother. The cause of this identity could be similar traits, geography, language, etc.
For the first part of the question I would go with B.
Pamela scores high on openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness and optimism and low on neuroticism and risk taking which would indicate that she is more than capable of being left to get on with the project with no problems and her supervisor can be friendly and warm towards her.
For the second part of the question I would go with D.
Pamela has average analytical intelligence, high practical intelligence and linguistic intelligence and very high emotional intelligence. This would indicate that she would not do well with the most difficult analytical aspects of the project, she would do well with the common sense part, she would do well with the written parts and she would do especially well with the emotional part of the project.
To calculate the percentage increase: First: work out the difference (increase) between the two numbers you are comparing. Then: divide the increase by the original number and multiply the answer by 100. If your answer is a negative number then this is a percentage decrease.
Answer: if it is based on the first statement "Yes" but for the second "No"
Explanation:
The athletic director tells a student that in return for staying in the team, that the team must submit to sexual advances. From the words in this statement, it is a purely sexual harassment as the director has conditioned the student , that he/she must submit to his sexual advances to stay in the team, which obviously from the statement, it can be understood that there must have been some form of rejection from the directors advances. definitely the school will be held liable for quid pro quo if discovered because it is involving a school official in a sexual harassment case.
Concerning the second statement, there can be some sort of mutual understanding between the students. It is refereed to has sexual relationship not sexual harassment Definitely, the school cant be help liable because it is between students not a school official