1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
4 years ago
8

Historian A:The American Revolution was caused by the American colonists’ greedy desire for more money. They were simply tired o

f paying their fair share of taxes to the British government, even though British troops protected the colonies during the French and Indian War! Furthermore, their claims to be fighting for freedom and liberty are totally wrong. Many of the colonists still owned slaves at the time of the Revolution! The traitorous American colonists simply wanted to steal land that was already claimed by Great Britain.Historian B:The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain’s repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people’s food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it’s no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people! A.Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about the American Revolution. B.Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than making any strong claims. C.Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that support their arguments. D.Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not experience the American Revolution.
History
2 answers:
S_A_V [24]4 years ago
7 0
C. they're both pretty biased and only talk about their own strong points

Anestetic [448]4 years ago
4 0
The coeeect answer is c!
You might be interested in
What is the main purpose of the preamble of the u.s constitution
Lorico [155]
It explains why the framers of the constitution made our government a republican.
8 0
3 years ago
Ut yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that
Rashid [163]

Dear neighbor.

I would like to inform you that the constitution has finally been established in our country and that this brings good and bad news which I will inform you in this letter.

Among the good news we will have a strong central government, which will be able to efficiently manage the government throughout the territory, centralizing the economy and an army that will be stronger and better equipped. However, the states, and this is the part that may be disadvantageous for us, had to commit to positioning itself in submission to this central government, that is, we will maintain this type of government, paying the taxes that it stipulates, following the laws that this stipulates, having representation as it stipulates and having the economy regulated by it.

Its like a tyrannical system, but it is a rich man that we run to develop the country. In addition, most states will commit to this system, which does not allow foreign funds.

Sincerely

J.K.

8 0
3 years ago
One goal of the Congress of Vienna was to restore power to
soldi70 [24.7K]

One goal of the Congress of Vienna was to restore power to <u>absolute monarchies. </u>

The Congress of Viena was celebrated between 1814 and 1815 and gathered many conservative European leaders who sought to design a long-term peace plan after the French Revolution and others derived from it and after the Napoleonic Wars.

<u>Apart from restoring peace, they aimed to restore former state formats,</u> as they did not support republicanism or other revolutionary principles. Therefore, <u>they wanted to return to absolutism and old regime</u> and they determined to create a joint army that would enforce such decision.

3 0
3 years ago
According to Brown vs. Board of Education when were public schools and universities supposed to integrate?
BigorU [14]

Answer:

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

hope it helped

5 0
3 years ago
After conquering greece, what was philip's next move?
Tamiku [17]
After conquering Greece Philips next move was to conquer Persia

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did most of the uprisings fail in 1848
    11·2 answers
  • Is Greenland on the Pangea map?
    5·2 answers
  • Which word is derived from a Latin or Greek root that means "head"?
    13·1 answer
  • Ethel and Julius Rosenberg are MOST known for which of these events?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Marshall Plan?
    5·2 answers
  • The priests were corrupt and idolatry was widely practiced during the time of:
    11·1 answer
  • 5 questions about Transcendentalism please?
    9·1 answer
  • Which scenario best illustrates the principle of checks and balances?
    5·1 answer
  • The house of burgesses marked the beginning of what english colonies
    6·1 answer
  • One feature setting the southern colonies apart from the middle colonies was that..?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!