Answer:
I have several teams that run zone.
For years the 2/3 was all that was played, but today, with the right players the 3/2 is very effective.
For several reasons, the 3/2 works much better today than in the past. Don't sell it too short.
If I had to play one or the other 100% of the time... I am positive I would play 3/2... at least until the game evolved again and it no longer worked.zags, in your opinion what is the biggest draw back's of playing the 3-2? The positioning obviously helps to take away the 3 ball and your outside shooting. Disadvantage? Stopping the LP and rebounding? When playing the 3-2 what do I need to account for or take into consideration? Thanks for your thoughts.
Explanation:
Respiratory system is the answer
Could you continue your sentence? If......
<span> It is often referred to as predatory </span>aggression<span> and is associated with </span>goal<span>-oriented, planned, hidden, or controlled behavior. In instrumental </span>aggression<span>, you would harm a person to obtain some other </span>goal<span>, such as money.</span>
Answer:
By offering constructive criticism rather than simply criticizing, you are treating the leadership with respect. You are legitimately challenging them and at the same time demonstrating an interest in opening a conversation with them about improvement or change.
Explanation: