Answer:
the $$$ of the different thing will play a big part
Ellie would have annual expenses of $15000+$3000+$1000+$1200+$35000=$55,200. If she cashed in her $20.000 deposit then her balance owing would be $35,200 so she would have to make at least this much or preferably the $55,200 to break even.,
Answer:
A. Decrease
Explanation:
In investment appraisal with the method of Net Present Value, the bone of contention and the central matter is the TIME VALUE OF MONEY.
In the above scenario, the initial working capital was 100% released in proportions of 40%, 40% and 20%, throughout the 3 years of the project. However, if the reverse had been the case, i.e. parting with more cash now and the requirement of working capital now becomes: Year 0 = -10,000, Year 1 = - 10,000, Year 2 = -10,000, Year 3 = +30,000; the NPV would definitely shrink because the value of 10,000 each in Years 0-2 would not be the same when it is recovered from the project in year 3. The value will be smaller and hence the NPV of the project would have decreased as a result of the time value of money.
I think it is either C or D. I'm not sure which one though. Hope this helped, have a great day! :D
