Answer:D) overconfidence
Explanation:Overconfidence (effect)
The overconfidence effect occurs when our subjective confidence in our own capability is greater that the actual or objective performance.
This means a person is so confident in a way that they measure their capabilities beyond what they can actual do in reality. A person doesn't take into account the effect of reality in their actions. A person doesn't consider some other facts or aspects that may come their way to actual create a setback in what they are planning. This is seen in planning fallacy when a person overestimate the times it would take them to finish a task , they do this by not considering that in everything we do they may be some delays or stumbling blocks we may have to face and deal with that may even affect our decision or planning.
Answer:
hi your are fan of bts are you please answer me
The Caribbean sea is a sea of the atlantic so it would effect it by maybe melting
Anticipation is primary emotion is most closely related to joy
A feeling of pleasure or anxiety in anticipation of an anticipated event is called anticipation. Fear, anxiety, hope, and trust are all examples of anticipatory feelings. If the anticipated event does not occur, disappointment (in the case of a positive event) or relief (in the case of a negative event) follow.
Anticipation is excitement, eager anticipation that something you know will happen. A person who has just proposed marriage longs for a positive response. Anticipation can be nervous anticipation, like when a birthday party is waiting for Elmer to come.
To know more about anticipation visit
brainly.com/question/28198899
#SPJ4
Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
